Hi, > Are __bit and __sbit implemented for PIC14?
No, neiter __bit nor __sbit is supported on PICs. You can achieve mostly the same effect (except for pointers to __bit-type data) using bitfields with named fields and #defines to access individual bits. > As far as I can make out from a brief look at the source, it looks like > bit/sbit keywords are commented out of main.c for both PIC14 and PIC16 > for some reason. Probably laziness ;-) ... or assumed lack of benefit: If the PICs had bit-addressable memory, supporting __bit would be required / helpful. The PICs do not, so we did not invest the effort required to support __bit. You may file a feature request to change that, but I am not really willing to spend time on this one unless you (or someone else) convince me with an undeniable argument ;-) Best regards Raphael ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
