No, that's not true. If some company creates a compatible copy of a
microchip controller, their license prohibits the use of the header file
with this copy.

Maarten

> As the hardware addresses have no utility other than for mchp hardware,
> it would follow that the license is not the issue.
>
> ps.  if mchp's goal is to preserve or manage the truthfulness of "if
> you're
> making money, we want to make money", then since "if you're not making
> money, then we're making money" is also true, there's really not likely
> to be a rational objection.
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Borut Razem <borut.ra...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 03/30/2011 11:20 AM, Raphael Neider wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> >> I am curious if there is any interest in GPL+LE/LP pic/pic16 headers?
>> > Well, yes!
>> >
>> > I just want to inform you that, IIRC, Microchip recently offered half
>> a
>> > year or maybe a year ago (I believe after Borut asked them?) to
>> somehow
>> > publish their device descriptions in some kind of XML database for use
>> by
>> > gputils/sdcc/whoever.
>> > This would probably not solve the licensing issues towards making the
>> > files (L)GPL'able (not sure what license would be possible), but it
>> would
>> > be an alternative source of data, e.g., for verifying your results.
>> > Unfortunately, I have no idea as to if or how or where said XML
>> database
>> > is available already.
>> >
>>
>> Yes, I exchanged several e-mails with them.They said several times that
>> they'll give us access to the XML pic device database, but this never
>> happened. But anyway, the pic .h and .c files, produced from the their
>> XML database wold have the same legal limitations as the current ones,
>> generated from MPASM include files: they can be used only for chips,
>> produced by Microchip. So no GPL.
>>
>> I think the correct way to produce the GPL .h and .c files is directly
>> from the documentation, as Wes suggested. But even for this approach I'm
>> not sure if it is 100% legal. Has anybody take a detailed look into the
>> documentation if there is a statement which prohibits such actions?
>>
>> Borut
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Create and publish websites with WebMatrix
>> Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself;
>> WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and
>> publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sdcc-user mailing list
>> Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.google.com/profiles/john.douglas.pritchard
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Create and publish websites with WebMatrix
> Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself;
> WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and
> publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf
> _______________________________________________
> Sdcc-user mailing list
> Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Create and publish websites with WebMatrix
Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself; 
WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and 
publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf
_______________________________________________
Sdcc-user mailing list
Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user

Reply via email to