Hello, Maarten. While I don't have strong feelings about this, I'm curious about the reasoning behind your suggestion. Since those 5 are only present on the cc2431, would it not make more sense to keep them separate? (I just had a look at the Keil site and they appear to have done the same thing).
Whatever works best for SDCC works for me too. If they are to go inside cc2430.h, I would recommend something like 'cc2431 only' as part of the comment line. Best Regards George Maarten Brock wrote: > Hi George, > > May I suggest that we include these lines in the current > cc2430.h? > > Maarten > >> Hello all, >> >> I've written a mini header file with declarations for TI's cc2431 >> RFRs. This 8051-based SoC is identical to the cc2430, enhanced with >> a location engine. The loc. eng. is controlled through 5 new RFRs so >> what I've done is, I've only declared those 5 and then included >> cc2430.h for everything else (which in turn includes compiler.h for >> us). >> >> It's based on the cc2431 data sheet (Rev. 2.01) SWRS034B: >> http://focus.ti.com/general/docs/lit/getliterature.tsp?literatureNumber=swrs034b >> >> I'm attaching it here with GPL+LE and happy for it to be distributed >> with SDCC or for anyone to use. >> >> Hoping someone will find it handy. Best Regards ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App & Earn a Chance To Win $500! Tap into the largest installed PC base & get more eyes on your game by optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
