Peter, The coding is similar. The RAM is organized in banks of 256 bytes, the stack is 31 entries deep, three index registers with 4 addressing modes, the stack is usable for data storage, and a 10MHz oscillator can be X4, loads of A/D.
And SDCC works! George Peter Chant wrote: > On Sunday 27 July 2008, George M. Gallant wrote: > >> Since the pic16f877a has 386 bytes of RAM, saving a few hundred words >> would be significant. The pic18f2620 is in the same package with almost >> 4k bytes of RAM at a very similar price. Just my 2 cents, but if you are >> that >> close to the limits, it is time to consider different hardware. >> > > Is there much of a jump coding wise? I've been using 16F various as I > started > with those. Just curious. > > Pete > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
