> > Thank you (Raphael) for having answered my question. > I think something need to be added to my code or compilation command to > reduce compilation code size, because the same program (using float > variables) was compiled in IAR and MikroC and the results were about > 4.8KBytes of code size (60%) on both compilers. > I think SDCC is a good compiler, but it really optimes code size? I believe > the answer is yes, but I don't know how... Any compiler directive? > --opt-code-size didn't work... > > Thanks, > > Rogério >
Hello Rogerio, unfortunately bigger code is the "feature" of SDCC. I asked similar question and nobody could answer. I think that main problem is the optimization of variables in banks (at least for PIC14 port which I seldom use). I would prefer better code optimization in SDCC as well. Currently I have to write one application which eats a lot of memory. And can not use SDCC because it can't fit into memory... If somebody is able to optimize the SDCC code, i can test it. But I am not able to write a compiler ( or to extend it). Vaclav ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
