On Wed, 2 Apr 2014 22:12:09 -0400 Mike Gerwitz <m...@mikegerwitz.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 01:11:27AM +0200, Amadeusz Sławiński wrote: > > I can spend time separating patches into something that can be > > acceptable for official tree without breaking existing > > functionality. > > You have a lot of commit history that I'd hate to see separated into > patches---I'd rather see branches created in the place of patches with > aggressive rebasing to cut everything out, which will keep the > individual commits. (Which can be done easily with `git rebase -i`.) > > Of course, depending on what stuff is controversial, it may be just > as easy to instead rebase to *remove* the commits that are no longer > desired. > Either way it will require reviewing all of commits. Having separated feature into separate branch git send-email shouldn't hurt anyone ;) Amadeusz
