-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 William Pursell wrote: > Does screen still attempt to support platforms that > do not provide reliable signals? Is there any reason > not to modify the code to use sigaction instead? > > It would be nice to remove the sigset/signal/sigvec > checks from the configury and modify the code to > use sigaction. Would there be any objection to > incorporating such a patch?
I guess it boils down to: are there any systems we should still be supporting that don't have sigaction available? It might be safest to offer it as a conditionally compiled alternative; but yeah, I'd take that. - -- Micah J. Cowan Programmer, musician, typesetting enthusiast, gamer. GNU Maintainer: wget, screen, teseq http://micah.cowan.name/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAklvXaUACgkQ7M8hyUobTrEW6gCfZRfFy+Y9+RMV+IsuM3+ZCetN z4IAnAvrEoQqwjp44gWOz3Jzf+vD7FY+ =jQpf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
