-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Thunderbird occasionally mistakes the quoting levels, apparently. For some reason, your response is "deeper" than mine.
Juergen Weigert wrote: > Karl, your input is appreciated on this. > > On Jun 12, 08 11:02:47 -0700, Micah Cowan wrote: > Hm, just to be clear, I was speaking of myself when I spoke of a > "vice-maintainer"; you'll still need to find someone to be the "real" > maintainer, > >> Agreed, welcome fellow Vice-Maintainer :-) Thank you. :) >> I've flicked a few switches on https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/screen/ >> you should feel more comfortable there now. > >> Can you help us finding additional staff? >> You mentioned that you were successful on that with wget, so ... Heh. I really didn't do much: it was a short blurb I posted, at the suggestion of one of our GSoC students, Saint Xavier (to whom I'm very grateful). I guess just more people watch those than I had thought. But I'll try to post something up. Perhaps it would be better to wait a bit until I have a better idea of the work that needs doing. > I think, unless that would be help enough to allow you to > remain in that role; there will at least need to be someone else to take > on most of the actual development stuff. > >> We have a decent backlock of bugs and patches filed at savannah. >> Working on these alone, plus some VCS is an appreciated step forward. Alright. There are a few bugs that are set to the "Fixed" state, but are not "Closed". Some of these have had additional comments since they were marked "Fixed". For instance, https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?15921 has an additional patch that was added after the fix (the patch looks like it might perhaps be useful, but I'm doubtful whether it's related to the actual bug report to which it's attached). Another example is https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?16483, which has some comments about the handling of free()s, in the patch that had been applied some years earlier. As to migrating to a different VCS: have you guys given some thought as to which ones you would prefer? You mentioned Subversion and Git. I'll note that Coreutils and Gnulib are both using Git currently. I've certainly come to appreciate the preservation of all commit history in DAG form in DVCSses, as well as the convenience of being able to make commits to a repository without a net connection, with Wget's use of Mercurial. - From what I've seen of Mercurial and Git, they seem quite comparable in terms of feature sets and the like. Each seem to have their strengths and weaknesses, but the only real reason I chose Mercurial was strong multi-platform support. Savannah has just added support for Mercurial and Subversion repositories, so that's no longer a reason to prefer Git; but the fact that Gnulib and Coreutils (and, of course, the Linux folks) are using Git may be. I suppose Bazaar should be considered as well, especially since, AIUI, it is now officially a GNU project, unlike Git or Mercurial (to my knowledge). Also: are there any impediments to migrating GNU Screen to GPLv3+? AIUI, RMS would like all projects that are able to manage this, to do so. (I've removed Karl from the recipients, as I doubt he's interested in this discussions.) - -- Micah J. Cowan Programmer, musician, typesetting enthusiast, gamer, and GNU Wget Project Maintainer. http://micah.cowan.name/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIUX/t7M8hyUobTrERAm8KAJ4q4slxoUKBwVSkYNXeSWuXe+DfRgCeP7fg CurC4gS87Bd1X2vlL+IYbGw= =hYAP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ screen-devel mailing list screen-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/screen-devel
