Carlos Prados schrieb:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm planning to have finished my CT-API driver early next week. One of the
> things I would like my implementation to do is to work with the higer
> possible number of smartcards. I have some questions about T1 transport
> protocol and CT-API:
>
> Is it possible to access a T1 card using CT-API? I mean, is CT-API by
> definition restricted to T0 cards?
>
> Does anybody's CT-API implementation (Gregor or David) works with T1
> smartcards? Does anybody have an example or some documentation of about
> how to implement this protocol.
Take a look at the MCT-Spec. Part 8 because the MCT talks with the driver over the T=1
Protocol. So take
also a look into my CT-API it's a T=1
Protocol
>
> Another: Does it merits the worth having this protocol implemented within
> the CT-API. I only know of a smartcard that uses this protocol, the
> Deutsche GeldKarte purse card, and don't know if there is a great number
> of smartcards using T1 protocol.
>
Our Project, for example, issued about 30.000 T=1 cards.
I think both asynchronous Protocols (T=1, T=0) should be implementet.
Not to mention the memory cards
IMHO, the T=1 protocol will be more used in the future (in Germany)
Bye
Gregor
***************************************************************
Linux Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E.
(Movement for the Use of Smart Cards in a Linux Environment)
http://www.linuxnet.com/smartcard/index.html
***************************************************************
