On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 11:21:43AM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote: > > Also, if sv_membersh is copyrighted to the FSF a simple solution would > be relicensing it to avoid this requirement.
No, it isn't.
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 11:21:43AM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote: > > Also, if sv_membersh is copyrighted to the FSF a simple solution would > be relicensing it to avoid this requirement.
No, it isn't.