Richard Stallman wrote: > I decided not to publish the old versions. Not ony would have > complicated matters, there is also the issue that they don't have > licenses.
That does simplify things greatly. > The one thing I still need is to know how to specify the name of the > principal branch. I decided to wait for that info before committing > anything. What name do you want to use for the principal branch? Then specific instructions could be supplied. And actually it might be simplest if I were to reach into the remote git repository and set that as the default branch name, and then have you clone it again so that you don't need to do anything on your end. Bob
