[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > My understanding is that the university decides to use a certain > > service and tells students to run nonfree software to access the > > service. And Libre-Sapienza gives the students a way to access > > it without running that nonfree software. > > > > If that is true, the user of Libre-Sapienza is a student, > > not the university. > > > > If you think I've described the scenario wrong, what detail is wrong? > No, I don't think your description is wrong. Does anyone disagree with it, or have something to add? If my analysis is valid, then I contend Libre-Sapienza should be accepted. It does not require the student to run any nonfree software. It does not even encourage the student to use the service; the school compels them to do that. -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
