Follow-up Comment #19, sr #107671 (project administration): > To be precise, there are at least two repositories, > "administration.git" and "administration/savane.git"
Oh! It finally begins to become clear. And how is one supposed to know that, when https://savannah.gnu.org/git/?group=administration doesn't mention savane.git? Sigh. (This multiple repository per project stuff that git loves so much seems to me like a terrible idea for us. Creates so much confusion.) Anyway, so then how about changing the links to /p/administration? My main point is that it does not sound correct or maintainable to link to a specific git repository. Much better to link to a project. If no current projects suffice, we should make it so one does. (I seem to vaguely recall having this sam conversation with Sylvain years and years ago, and nothing coming of it. Sigh.) It sounds like the administration project has everything that is interesting, and all the savane projects are the rewrites that have never come to fruition. Is that accurate? Thanks, Karl _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/support/?107671> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/
