> Over-documenting it in the wiki will make it harder to find info > because of the noise effect, and make it more likely to get outdated > there. So I'm wondering if you have suggestions about this. > > Do you mean "overdocumenting" version control systems on savannah, or > savannah itself?
I meant savannah itself - but it probably a problem in the documentation, which is currently a bit incomplete and spread in different places. > If VC systems, I wasn't imagining giving any details on how to use all > the VC's. Just a wiki page that says "savannah supports these VC's: > cvs, bzr, svn, hg, git, <whatever>" with links to more info on each -- > probably their home pages, or other external web pages, or the wiki > pages if they are useful. > > In general, it doesn't seem like CVS is so important these days that > "CVS Instructions" should be in the navbar. It made sense when CVS was > the only VC. We could remove it, yes. -- Sylvain
