Hi,
I'm evaluating the project you submitted for approval in Savannah.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> A package was submitted to savannah.nongnu.org
> This mail was sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> described the package as follows:
> License: fdl
> Other License: Also Creative Commons ShareAlike 1.0 or above. We wish to support
> this licence as a positive contribution to Free Content.
> Package: NVDA Encyclopedia
> System name: nvdaopedia
> Type: non-GNU
>
> Description:
> This project is to provide an encyclopedia of non-violent direct
> action techniques and tactics (Working definition: no
> physical/verbal violence to living things or excessive property
> damage). Content will be standardized in the Docbook format and
> (through software conversion) published in xhtml and pdf
> formats. Content will mostly be collaboratively
> reformatted/rewritten content from other websites, licensed by the
> content owners under the GNU Free Documentation or Creative Commons
> ShareAlike licences.
Hum,
I'm still a bit confused by your description.
Does your project qualify as an educational textbook project? Does
your project qualify as Software Documentation project?
I think that the content of your work is outside the scope of
Savannah, which is mainly about computing.
If you think that your project truly enters inside the Savannah scope,
feel free to resubmit, with a clear explanation about that,
Regards,
--
Mathieu Roy
Homepage:
http://yeupou.coleumes.org
Not a native english speaker:
http://stock.coleumes.org/doc.php?i=/misc-files/flawed-english
_______________________________________________
Savannah-hackers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/savannah-hackers
