Hugo Gayosso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > It's not a Savannah bug (apparently each time something is lost, > > Savannah get the blame). > > The following mail has been sent to gnueval the 21 Jun, when the > > project was register, so you should ask to the gnueval team for an > > explanation. > > gnueval does not receive those emails, they are sent to > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > > So the process is: > > User -> Savannah-hackers -> maintainers -> gnueval > > And as far as I remember it was bkuhn who decided to send the requests > from Savannah-hackers to maintainers instead of directly to gnueval.
The former script we use was sending mail to both maintainers and gnueval, so the name of the script is "forward the request to gnueval". But since 2001, it only send the mail to maintainers, while the script still have the old name. So unless we look at the code, it leads to think that we actually send the mail to gnueval. <http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/savannah/savannah/frontend/php/admin/gnueval.php.diff?r1=1.2&r2=1.3&diff_format=h> > I have seen a bunch of requests like those coming out of > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> that don't reach > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. So maybe we should readd gnueval in the script so both gnueval and maintainers will receive it. Regards, -- Mathieu Roy Homepage: http://yeupou.coleumes.org Not a native english speaker: http://stock.coleumes.org/doc.php?i=/misc-files/flawed-english _______________________________________________ Savannah-hackers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/savannah-hackers
