On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 11:07:35AM +0200, Ingo Ruhnke wrote: > Rudy Gevaert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Licensing under the "GNU GPL v2 only" is problematic. Would you > > please agree to license under the "GNU GPL v2 or later"? > > > > The reason for this is that when we publish GPL v3, it will be > > important for all GPL-covered programs to advance to GPL v3. If you > > don't put this in the files now, the only way to port your program > > to GPL v3 would be to ask each and every copyright holder, and that > > may be very difficult. > > The problem is that I am only taking over this project from the former > maintainers I don't own the copyright on the source myself. I agree > that GPLv2-only is problematic, but since I am not the copyright owner > I can't simply change it to GPLv2-or-later.
Ok. I'll approve your project. -- Rudy Gevaert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web page http:/www.webworm.org GNU/Linux for schools http://www.nongnu.org/glms Savannah hacker http://savannah.gnu.org _______________________________________________ Savannah-hackers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/savannah-hackers
