On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 03:40:51PM -0700, David R. Hill wrote: > What *are* the real implications of "private" and "public", apart from the > obvious idea that only authorised project members can access "private" but > "public" ought to be accessible by anyone who knows the URLs?
I think that are the only implications. But I am not sure. The other sv-hackers will give you a correct answer. > When the project was originally set up, the question of public access was > discussed and I simply went along with what was decided, not necessarily > understanding all of the consequences. > > Still working on my ignorance :-) Nobody is perfect :) In the mean time; David: I have set the original gnuspeech project to public status. And it seems to work for me. Can you access it? Savannah-hackers: I did not yet remove the second project that needs to be removed, because I don't know what will happen when I remove it through the webinterface. I think it will delete the original project sources. Could you check this? Rudy -- Rudy Gevaert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web page http:/www.webworm.org GNU/Linux for schools http://www.nongnu.org/glms Savannah hacker http://savannah.gnu.org _______________________________________________ Savannah-hackers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/savannah-hackers
