On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 10:06:54AM +0200, Tais M. Hansen wrote: > No problem. I was referring to the "Slackware Linux" distribution because I > thought it was the name. But I've done some checking up on it and it would > seem that only "Slackware" is a registered trademark. So according to the url > you sent, Slackware GNU/Linux would seem to be the correct name. It does, > however, look like the people behind Slackware calls themselves "Slackware > Linux, Inc."
Linux is only the kernel. http://www.gnu.org/gnu/why-gnu-linux.html has an extensive explanation about why calling GNU/Linux GNU/Linux is so important for us. > > > > > Basic makefiles and makefiles for the existing 15 sources are available > > > via email if needed (16kb). > > Please e-mail it to me. > > It should be attached to this reply. It's a complete tarball of the current > version. To release your project under the GPL, you should put copyright notices and copying permission statements at the beginning of every source-code file, and include a copy of the plain text version of the GPL (http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.txt). Put it in a file named COPYING. Please follow the advice of http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html. The GPL FAQ explain the reason behind these recommendations. For example, there is an entry explaining why the GPL requires including a copy of the GPL with every copy of the program: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#WhyMustIInclude Please send me an updated tarball. Kind regards, Rudy -- Rudy Gevaert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web page http:/www.webworm.org GNU/Linux for schools http://www.nongnu.org/glms Savannah hacker http://savannah.gnu.org _______________________________________________ Savannah-hackers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/savannah-hackers
