Hi > > Speaking of my previous submission effort, the approval was allocated to Mathieu > > Roy. However, I never received emails from him (I only recently read his emails on > > the savannah web-based email archive). > > As such, I didn\'t quite know what was going on. If I had, I wouldve resubmitted > > earlier. > > > > It was possible that my email provider was the problem (a free shell account > > called cyberspace.org). I have now changed my savannah email address, so hopefully > > this will now be ok. > > I hope too. Usually when I received a mailer-daemon error that seem > related to my own system (rare, with some stupid anti-spam policies), > I ask to other savannah hackers to try to send my messge. > Well, I received this mail ok at least :-)
> > > > The mail web archive also showed that Mathieu asked me if it was > > mature enough, for you to give a link to it for submissions that > > have no copyright comment. (see > > http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/savannah-hackers/2003-01/msg00536.html). In > > answer to that question. Yes it is mature enough for that, but no, > > it doesnt not support mBSD. I would look into this. > > As it work with GPL and LGPL, which are the licences we promote, I > think we could already give an link to your project. > > However, there is a major problem that need to be fixed before, IMHO: > it does not force users to specify a copyright holder (2003 this mail > <thismail>). Ok, good point. I'll look into it :) > > Another bug, minor this one, is the fact that the sheebang > (#!/usr/bin/perl) is not escaped to remain on the very top of the > message. I'd say thats quite a serious bug. noted. > > Aside from this bug, it would be greate if gin was able to determine > which comment file is appropriate. > > For instance, if I do > gin file.pl > gin should be able to pick "shellscript/perl # comments". > The -#, -c should be provided to force a selection. > This did occur to me, and I can't remember why I decided against this. It is a good idea though. > Finally, gin would be able to deal with a complete directory: > gin `find . ! -type d` > He would pick the correct style and do nothing with undetermined > files. > > What do you think? Yes, perhaps with a user prompting option for cautious users. > Please, tell us when the 2 bugs (copyright missing, sheebang), at this > moment we'll provide a link. Will do. Although it won't be immediate :( (I have recently started a job and relocated, and have no net access on my linux box, which hinders my developing..but i'll sort something out ). > > I have not submitted for gnu project assessment, because I think there are various > > gnu standards that it fails to meet. However, I would like to submit it for the > > gnu project at a later date. > > No problem. > > > > -- > Mathieu Roy > > << Profile << http://savannah.gnu.org/users/yeupou << > >> Homepage >> http://yeupou.coleumes.org >> > << GPG Key << http://stock.coleumes.org/gpg << > Alex Sisson _______________________________________________ Savannah-hackers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/savannah-hackers