On Sat, Mar 09, 2019 at 09:14:09AM -0800, John Sullivan wrote: > > Both make sense to me. Retaining old inactive data is a security risk -- > magnifies the impact of any database breach.
I checked the records for <rms> as a datapoint. that account has never been used in any trackers, and there was a period of 6 years when essentially no group status for that account was modified. of course, he did commit to VCS, but this is considerably harder to check.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
