Hello, Savannah hackers! The submitter of the goasys[1] package said:
"(I want to use GNU public license but with one restriction: primary license is for None Commercial use. secondary license is for Commercial use. When this is not possible, which license can i use instead?)" I can't quite understand what he intends by that comment. Furthermore, IANAL. What's the canonical approach? To point him to FSF's licensing and compliance lab[2]? Footnotes: [1] https://savannah.gnu.org/task/?13744 [2] [email protected] -- ,= ,-_-. =. Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro (oitofelix) [0x28D618AF] ((_/)o o(\_)) http://oitofelix.freeshell.org/ `-'(. .)`-' irc://chat.freenode.org/oitofelix \_/ xmpp:[email protected] GNU ccd2cue maintainer GNU Savannah hacker GNU web translation team coordinator (Brazilian Portuguese) GNU audio and video maintainer DMOZ free software editor (Portuguese) UFU FAMAT PET member [GNU DISCLAIMER] I'm a GNU hacker, but my views don't necessarily match those of the GNU project. Hereby I express my own opinion, style and perception, in good faith, aiming the betterment of GNU.
pgplVtuNVp0AJ.pgp
Description: Assinatura digital OpenPGP
