On 24 May 2011 23:15, Karl Berry <[email protected]> wrote: > It looks more like loggerhead spawning too many processes... > > 1. If there's any info for debugging, perhaps tell Martin Pool and the > other bzr people(I can look up all the addrs if need be). My > understanding from the discussion was that this wasn't supposed to > happen any more.
Please do. > 2. Is it possible to run loggerhead (and/or other web viewers) through > xinetd or some other throttler? This seems to happen with every web > viewer on occasion. Just wondering, not implementing, sorry :(. Perhaps better would be to use Apache (or whatever) as a reverse proxy, limiting the rate of incoming requests or the number live at any time. Martin
