Sylvain wrote: > I don't think such a section would be acceptable. What you can add as > an invariant section is pretty limited and can't be anything one want.
>From the FDL: A "Secondary Section" is a named appendix or a front-matter section of the Document that deals exclusively with the relationship of the publishers or authors of the Document to the Document's overall subject (or to related matters) and contains nothing that could fall directly within that overall subject. (Thus, if the Document is in part a textbook of mathematics, a Secondary Section may not explain any mathematics.) The relationship could be a matter of historical connection with the subject or with related matters, or of legal, commercial, philosophical, ethical or political position regarding them. The "Invariant Sections" are certain Secondary Sections whose titles are designated, as being those of Invariant Sections, [...] These restrictions on content seem trivial and easy to evade. As long as the publishers or authors can relate their denial of climate change to the overall subject, maybe by historical connection, philosophy, ethics or politics, it looks fine for them to include it as invariant. For GNU statistical software for example, this seems very easy to do. Imagine starting the appendix "I first started to use this software after someone used it to illustrate the spurious climate change relationship, which is wrong because..." You could probably do something similar for almost any topic. Please can you explain why that would not be allowed? Thanks, -- MJR/slef
