Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Afaics dual-licensing is a way to avoid the kind of problems you > mentioned (for your specific examples I think there are others).
Dual-licensing would not avoid these kind of problems, because users could choose which licence to use and could pick FDL, which allows licensees to attach unremovable chapters. See http://www.mysql.de/www/company/legal/licensing/faq.html for MySQL AB's description of it, or http://www.lamsfoundation.org/faq/04.html for an explanation from part of Macquarie University, Australia. > Note that it's not about accepting the GFDL as a license, > since we already do so. Understood. My request is that you do not require licensors to use the FDL, as you don't at present. Sincerely, -- MJ Ray - personal email, see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Work: http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ irc.oftc.net/slef Jabber/SIP ask
