Hi Luiz, Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca writes:
> Hi, > > We already have more than 500 commits since 1.0.25. As a downstream > maintainer (openwrt/lede), I get lost between those tons of patches > and how to select them to be backported. > > Shouldn't sane-backend release a new version? As Allan mentioned in another reply, there is talk of releasing sometime in April. > Also, It would be really nice if SANE could keep a stable branch. It would > be, at least, a place to target cherry-picks. Considering the way things work now (as in, we don't do bug fix releases of any kind), the RELEASE_1_0_x tag would be the start of your stable branch for the largest value of x. > Maybe it could change its version number to something like other projects > do as: > > x.y.0 - feature release x.y > x.y.n - fix release n > > It would be better if x.y is year/month. At least there is no discussion on > whether the new release is big enough to tic the first number. This would break the dll backend, like, completely. For better of for worse (the latter if you ask me), that backend's backend loading logic is tightly tied to the package's version number. To such an extent, that we cannot even release a 1.1.x without breaking stuff, IIRC. Hope this, eh, helps, -- Olaf Meeuwissen, LPIC-2 FSF Associate Member since 2004-01-27 GnuPG key: F84A2DD9/B3C0 2F47 EA19 64F4 9F13 F43E B8A4 A88A F84A 2DD9 Support Free Software https://my.fsf.org/donate Join the Free Software Foundation https://my.fsf.org/join -- sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password" to sane-devel-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org
