m. allan noah writes: > I think we are all on the same page here regarding clarity of code, > and our concern over warnings. Long term, it would be great if sane > were warning free- but that would require that code get maintainers, > or get ejected. Given that some scanners we support have not been made > in 20 years, I think some level of pruning would cause little harm to > our users. > > But, for the immediate term, I would like to get some fixes in for > these sequencing errors- anyone care to take a stab at that?
As mentioned in my reply to Johannes, I'll take a stab but please note that whatever I come up with is a decent, educated guess. Nothing more, nothing less. Hope this helps, -- Olaf Meeuwissen, LPIC-2 FSF Associate Member since 2004-01-27 Support Free Software Support the Free Software Foundation https://my.fsf.org/donate https://my.fsf.org/join -- sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password" to sane-devel-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org
