Hello Stef, Stef <stef.dev <at> free.fr> writes: > On 05/08/2015 10:27, Michael Thayer wrote: > > Stef <stef.dev <at> free.fr> writes: > >> in genesys backend build 2508 (commit > >> 4eea901305c9cb66428023c93cbd1a63af8c5fba) I have just pushed fixes for > >> several opened issues in the bug tracker: [...] > > Sorry to say this, but the issue which I reported previously with the LIDE > > 210 is not fixed when I apply 09daef4 locally. When I move the usleep() up > > to the top of sanei_genesys_test_buffer_empty() however my scanner works again. [...] > and when you have an usleep at both places, how does it behave ?
Yes, that works too. Seems slightly hacky. I wonder whether a general delay, e.g. after writing to a register on a non-super-speed device on a super-speed port, might be what is needed? Regards, Michael -- sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password" to sane-devel-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org
