Hi Troels, Do you still have the ADF issue? If so, please send me a log file again.
We just don't disable button support for scanners without some. I added this to my todo list. Cheers, Rolf Am 07.11.2014 um 11:21 schrieb Troels Thomsen: > > Hi, > > Update: > > Everything I can thing of works fine through ethernet also! > :-) > > Another corner-case: > Button controlled scan is not supported in the windows-driver, and does > not work in XSane either. > Is there a 'capabilities' protocol from XSane to the backend, such that > if we mark 'button controlled scan' as not supported on this device, the > XSane gui does not show this checkbox? > Or we could just error the scan, if we get this request? > Just a thought ... > > /Troels > > > 2014-11-07 10:55 GMT+01:00 Troels Thomsen <troels.pil.thom...@gmail.com > <mailto:troels.pil.thom...@gmail.com>>: > > > MF8230 Scanner-driver is really good now through USB. (I'll test > with ethernet another day.) > > I've found two corner-cases. > > 1) > When choosing 3 copies from ADF in XSane, but putting 4 copies in > the scanner (!) : > - 3 pages are scanned correctly > - All 4 pages goes through the ADF, and printer is waiting for > something. > - After 30 sec or so, it breaks with a beep and prints "error > occured" in the display. > No other intervention is required (you *can* break it on the scanner > gui) - and scanner is not in bad-mode as we previously experienced. > So I'm OK with this. > > > 2) > In xsane, if you choose two copies , from Flatbed (!) the scanner > really scans twice at 300 dpi. > At 600 dpi (and e.g. 75 dpi) it ends with EBUSY, see below, and a > pop-up in XSane. > > Personally I'm OK with this, I don't know if we should do anything. > I don't know if this is a valid use-case. If not - it could also be > subject to input parameter validation in XSane or sane-backend. > How does this work on other scanners? > > <cut> > [pixma] IN T=723.027 len=14 > [pixma] 00000000:06 06 03 01 00 41 03 00 41 10 00 01 00 66 > [pixma] > [pixma] Current status: paper=1 cal=0 lamp=16 > [pixma] Current status: paper=1 cal=0 lamp=16 > [pixma] *iclass_finish_scan***** abort session ***** > [pixma] OUT T=723.027 len=10 > [pixma] 00000000:ef 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > [pixma] > [pixma] IN T=723.037 len=2 > [pixma] 00000000:06 06 > [pixma] > [pixma] pixma_read_image():completed > [pixma] Reader task terminated > > (this is all perfectly normal - now the next scan starts) > > [pixma] Reader task started > [pixma] > [pixma] pixma_scan(): start > [pixma] line_size=15360 image_size=107765760 channels=3 depth=8 > [pixma] dpi=600x600 offset=(0,0) dimension=5120x7016 > [pixma] [pixma] Reader task id=-1249522880 (threaded) > gamma_table=0x95d087c source=0 > [pixma] threshold=127 threshold_curve=0 > [pixma] ADF page count: 0 > [pixma] Setting non-blocking mode > [pixma] raw_width = 5120 > [pixma] OUT T=723.910 len=10 > [pixma] 00000000:f3 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 0c 00 > [pixma] > [pixma] IN T=723.917 len=14 > [pixma] 00000000:06 06 03 01 00 41 03 00 41 10 00 01 00 66 > [pixma] > [pixma] Current status: paper=1 cal=0 lamp=16 > [pixma] Current status: paper=1 cal=0 lamp=16 > [pixma] *iclass_scan***** start scanning ***** > [pixma] OUT T=723.917 len=10 > [pixma] 00000000:db 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > [pixma] > [pixma] IN T=723.927 len=2 > [pixma] 00000000:14 14 > [pixma] > [pixma] pixma_scan() failed EBUSY > [pixma] Reader task terminated: EBUSY > [pixma] read_image():reader task closed the pipe:0 bytes received, > 107765760 bytes expected > [pixma] pixma_close(): Canon i-SENSYS MF8200C Series > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2014-11-07 <tel:2014-11-07> 9:54 GMT+01:00 Troels Thomsen > <troels.pil.thom...@gmail.com <mailto:troels.pil.thom...@gmail.com>>: > > > Sorry for the delay. > It turns out, that the MF8230 has max resolution 300dpi from ADF > and 600 dpi from Platen Glass, see attached screenshots. > So there is no work here - except possibly to error this > condition and abort operation. > > I'll check again to see, if everything else seems to be working. > I think it does. > > /Troels > > > > See attached > > > > > > > > 2014-09-17 <tel:2014-09-17> 9:15 GMT+02:00 Rolf Bensch > <r...@bensch-online.de <mailto:r...@bensch-online.de>>: > > Hi Troels, > > For my understanding: Can you do multiple scanimage scans > without > power-cycling the device between two single scans? > > Cheers, > Rolf > > > Am 11.09.2014 um 22:52 schrieb Troels Thomsen: > > > > Hi, > > > > Attached is log of two pages scanned with adf at 600 dbp. > Device is > > freshly power-cycled before this trace. > > Xsane hangs until I break it with Ctrl+C in the terminal. > > From the look of the logfile, it seems like no real image > data is > > transmitted. Only the > > OUT T=60.552 len=11 > > [pixma] 00000000:d4 60 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 00 06 > > [pixma] > > [pixma] IN T=60.569 len=8 > > [pixma] 00000000:06 06 00 00 00 00 00 00 > > sequence is seen. > > > > > > Also attached is the xsane log for scanning with flatbed > at 600 dpi. > > Data is shown in window in xsane, but an error-box is > displayed, and > > logfile seems to end with a EBUSY. > > > > Oddly, imho, scanimage just ends like this: > > > > > > [pixma] > > [pixma] IN T=17.647 len=7680 > > [pixma] 00000000:ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff > ff ff ff > > [pixma] 00000010:ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff > ff ff ff > > [pixma] 00000020:ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff > ff ff ff > > [pixma] 00000030:ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff > ff ff ff > > [pixma] 00000040:ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff > ff ff ff > > [pixma] 00000050:ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff > ff ff ff > > [pixma] 00000060:ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff > ff ff ff > > [pixma] 00000070:ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff > ff ff ff > > [pixma] ... > > [pixma] > > [pixma] IN T=17.647 len=8 > > [pixma] 00000000:f1 f0 ee f1 ed ee eb e3 > > [pixma] > > [pixma] OUT T=17.647 len=11 > > [pixma] 00000000:d4 60 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 00 06 > > [pixma] > > [pixma] IN T=17.656 len=8 > > [pixma] 00000000:06 06 28 00 00 00 00 00 > > [pixma] > > [pixma] OUT T=17.678 len=10 > > [pixma] 00000000:f3 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 0c 00 > > [pixma] > > [pixma] IN T=17.688 len=14 > > [pixma] 00000000:06 06 03 01 00 41 03 00 41 10 00 01 00 66 > > [pixma] > > [pixma] Current status: paper=1 cal=0 lamp=16 > > [pixma] Current status: paper=1 cal=0 lamp=16 > > [pixma] OUT T=17.688 len=10 > > [pixma] 00000000:f3 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 0c 00 > > [pixma] > > [pixma] IN T=17.696 len=14 > > [pixma] 00000000:06 06 03 01 00 41 03 00 41 10 00 01 00 66 > > [pixma] > > [pixma] Current status: paper=1 cal=0 lamp=16 > > [pixma] Current status: paper=1 cal=0 lamp=16 > > [pixma] *iclass_finish_scan***** abort session ***** > > [pixma] OUT T=17.696 len=10 > > [pixma] 00000000:ef 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > > [pixma] > > [pixma] IN T=17.706 len=2 > > [pixma] 00000000:06 06 > > [pixma] > > [pixma] pixma_read_image():completed > > [pixma] Reader task terminated > > [pixma] pixma_close(): Canon i-SENSYS MF8200C Series > > > > I.e. NO error when using scanimage, but EBUSY when using > XSane !?!? > > > > > > > > /Troels > > > > > > 2014-09-11 19:18 GMT+02:00 Rolf Bensch > <r...@bensch-online.de <mailto:r...@bensch-online.de> > > <mailto:r...@bensch-online.de > <mailto:r...@bensch-online.de>>>: > > > > Hi Troels, > > > > Am 09.09.2014 um 23:11 schrieb Troels Thomsen: > > > Hi Rolf > > > > > > patch new1 seems to work! > > > > > > regarding ADF its mixed: > > > At 150 dpi it scans pages, but colors are a bit > psycedelic. Bacground > > > should be white. > > > > You need to do some gamma settings. It's easier to use > xsane here. > > > > > At 600 dpi it fails, and scanner hangs. > > > > > > > It seems that your scanner doesn't finish the scan > correctly @ any > > resolution. I saw an unsupported paper status. > > > > Please restart your scanner and test 600 dpi directly. And > please try a > > multi page ADF scan after you repowered your scanner. > > > > Please send new log files. Then I'll patch this next > weekend. > > > > Cheers, > > Rolf > > > > > /Troels > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2014-09-03 21:15 GMT+02:00 Rolf Bensch > <r...@bensch-online.de <mailto:r...@bensch-online.de> > <mailto:r...@bensch-online.de <mailto:r...@bensch-online.de>> > > > <mailto:r...@bensch-online.de > <mailto:r...@bensch-online.de> > <mailto:r...@bensch-online.de <mailto:r...@bensch-online.de>>>>: > > > > > > Hi Troels, > > > > > > OK, based on recent git code I prepared a new patch. > > > > > > With this patch I revert last patch2 and try to fix > scan end detection. > > > > > > If this patch is working for flatbed, please test ADF > scanning. > > > > > > Please send me a log file from ADF scanning, whatever > it's running or > > > not. If ADF gets stuck, please send me an ADF log > file from windows. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Rolf > > > > > > > > > Am 31.08.2014 <tel:31.08.2014> <tel:31.08.2014 > <tel:31.08.2014>> <tel:31.08.2014 <tel:31.08.2014> > > <tel:31.08.2014 <tel:31.08.2014>>> um 09:31 schrieb Troels > Thomsen: > > > > > > > > I have done a lot of testing with scan areas of 5 > by 5 milimeters, and > > > > that gives a false picture of what works and what > does not. (slightly > > > > different behaviour on BJNP and USB) > > > > Sorry > > > > > > > > Let's go back to usb and scanning large areas: > > > > > > > > Patch 1 (usb vid/pid) works, but scanner hangs in > "scanning". > > > > > > > > Patch 2 (generation 1), makes scanning fail as seen > in logfile of > > > > previous post. > > > > > > > > > > > > I've tested with git revision of ~ 1 august , and > of today, and picture > > > > is the same. Patch 2 makes it fail. > > > > > > > > Could it be that it's not a classic generation 1 or > generation 2, but a > > > > mix somehow? > > > > > > > > > > > > /Troels > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2014-08-30 12:55 GMT+02:00 Rolf Bensch > <r...@bensch-online.de <mailto:r...@bensch-online.de> > <mailto:r...@bensch-online.de <mailto:r...@bensch-online.de>> > > <mailto:r...@bensch-online.de <mailto:r...@bensch-online.de> > <mailto:r...@bensch-online.de <mailto:r...@bensch-online.de>>> > > > > <mailto:r...@bensch-online.de > <mailto:r...@bensch-online.de> > <mailto:r...@bensch-online.de <mailto:r...@bensch-online.de>> > > <mailto:r...@bensch-online.de <mailto:r...@bensch-online.de> > <mailto:r...@bensch-online.de > <mailto:r...@bensch-online.de>>>>>: > > > > > > > > Hi Troels, > > > > > > > > Am 30.08.2014 <tel:30.08.2014> <tel:30.08.2014 > <tel:30.08.2014>> <tel:30.08.2014 <tel:30.08.2014> > > <tel:30.08.2014 <tel:30.08.2014>>> <tel:30.08.2014 > <tel:30.08.2014> <tel:30.08.2014 <tel:30.08.2014>> > > > <tel:30.08.2014 <tel:30.08.2014> <tel:30.08.2014 > <tel:30.08.2014>>>> um 06:44 schrieb Troels > > Thomsen: > > > > > It seems that there is a problem with > mf8230 usb scanning. > > > > > > > > > > I'm pretty sure I did the testing with > the patches I got, > > > but now > > > > when I > > > > > pull from git, it fails. > > > > > Was anything added/changed recently in > pixma backend, > > that could > > > > > influence mf8230? > > > > > > > > I did a smarter implementation for setting > the generation > > > version = 1. > > > > But it's working, as you can see in the > log file. > > > > > > > > Are you sure that you disconnected the LAN > interface while > > > testing USB? > > > > And can you scan via LAN only? > > > > > > > > If this doesn't help, please go back to > the debugged Sane > > > version and > > > > patch the files again. Please send me a > working log file. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Rolf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password" to sane-devel-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org
