On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Mylan Connolly <mr.mylanman at gmail.com> wrote: > I suppose I could be confused, then. I saw mention here: > > http://www.sane-project.org/man/sane-coolscan3.5.html > > The backend must not be directly associated with SANE, then I take it? > > What I took from that documentation was; > > Set --batch-count=2 (and probably --batch, as well I would imagine), > and the --infrared=yes tag and it should work, however no combination > got it working, that I could find. > > I guess I'm just a little confused. >
You are reading it on our website, so its related :) I suppose the backend is trying to get around the limitation in the sane protocol by giving a second image with the IR data in it. However, the code contains the following: #ifndef SANE_FRAME_RGBI o.cap |= SANE_CAP_INACTIVE; #endif IOW: IR is disabled unless you build sane-backends with it specifically enabled. allan -- "The truth is an offense, but not a sin"
