Chris Bagwell on 12/18/2011 09:56 PM wrote: > Not really. I'm sure upstream libusb is the best place to discuss. > > As long as libusb project has a suggested work around/file location > for dealing with w64, we can accommodate it as well as standard usb.h > easy enough.
After thinking about it, I'm not sure libusb is interested in Windows. libusb-win32[1] though, is, and it is the project I use for libusb support. They renamed their include file "usb.h" to "lusb0_usb.h" in their latest release. Unfortunately they are not using MinGW (and state they have no plans for it) to build from source. Since the original libusb project will never compile/run on Windows I think a define should be added to use the libusb-win32 include file name. Even if you can't compile everything using MinGW. [1] https://sourceforge.net/projects/libusb-win32/
