Hello,
very late reply but meanwhile I got a similar issue report
from a user with a SCSI processor "EPSON Perfection1640":
On Jun 22 08:13 Olaf Meeuwissen wrote (excerpt):
> Julien BLACHE <jb at jblache.org> writes:
>> Simon Becherer <simon at becherer.de> wrote:
>>
>>> here there is the line for my "epson gt 10000+ scanner (scsi)":
>>>
>>> # Epson GT-10000+
>>> ATTRS{type}=="3", ATTRS{vendor}=="EPSON",
>>> ATTRS{model}=="SCANNER GT-10000"
>>
>> Added, thanks for your report!
>
> Hmm, I think we could use a wild card here, like so
>
> ATTRS{type}=="3", ATTRS{vendor}=="EPSON", ATTRS{model}="SCANNER*"
>
> and be done with.
What about one more wild card for any "SCSI processor EPSON Perfection*"
like
ATTRS{type}=="3", ATTRS{vendor}=="EPSON", ATTRS{model}="Perfection*"
See
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681146#c41
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
~> lsscsi -g
...
[11:0:2:0] process EPSON Perfection1640 1.03 - /dev/sg4
.
.
.
# sane-find-scanner
...
found SCSI processor "EPSON Perfection1640 1.03" at /dev/sg4
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kind Regards
Johannes Meixner
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH -- Maxfeldstrasse 5 -- 90409 Nuernberg -- Germany
HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendoerffer
