On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 06:22, stef wrote:

>       Hello,
> 
>       I've applied it.
> 
> Thanks,
>       Stef

Thank you for your help. In the long run, though, I think your
suggestion about 'uint8_t value[2]' is probably better (and more
elegant).

Regards,
Olaf


Reply via email to