On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Alessandro Zummo <azummo-lists at towertech.it> wrote: > On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 08:45:47 -0400 > "m. allan noah" <kitno455 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Correct. We will re-open the discussion of the API changes after we >> get 1.0.20 out the door. I suppose you could still send the RGBI data, >> and tell the front-end that it gets more bytes per line than expected. >> But that will make most front-ends choke, so it is a poor workaround. > > ?Here we go... 1.0.20 is way out of the door and it's time to reopen > ?this 4 (?) years old discussion. > > ?We have the new frame types in sane.h but they're > ?commented out... the question is... > > ?anyone is against removing that #if 0 ?
A- 're-open the discussion' != 'remove the #if 0' frankly, it is bad when we don't do frequent releases, and so we tell users of new equipment that they have to build from git repo, but the git repo uses a different API. so- lets release current tree as 1.0.21 in one month. At the same time, we finalize the 2.0 spec. If we keep it small, we can do a 2.0 release around Jan 1. I'm pretty busy, but if i can get some help we can swing it. i am sure sane 1.0.21 and sane 2.0.0 will have to live concurrently for a little while, so we will have to keep that in mind. comments? allan -- "The truth is an offense, but not a sin"
