On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 01:32:23 +0200, Olaf Meeuwissen <olaf.meeuwissen at avasys.jp> wrote:
> "Wolfram Heider" <wolframheider at freenet.de> writes: > >> It seems to be a pretty choosy bug - on my boxes (various 32 and 64 >> bit systems running under Opensuse 11.1 and 11.0) iscan 1.19 and the >> epkowa backend are working fine, and testing with all frontends >> available didn't show any problems. So could it be related just to >> particular distributions/operating systems? > > You mean 2.19.0, right. We never released a 1.19 ;-) Sorry - a mistyping > > It a logic bug in the backend. Like I said, iscan is not affected but > other SANE frontends may be. It depends on the frontend checking > whether an option is active before it allows you to set it. > I know that iscan isn't affected. But my point was that with me any other frontends (as scanimage, scanadf, kooka, xsane, etc) weren't affected neither. >> On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:55:46 +0200, Olaf Meeuwissen >> <olaf.meeuwissen at avasys.jp> wrote: >> >>> "m. allan noah" <kitno455 at gmail.com> writes: >>> >>>> yesterday on the list this was announced as a problem with iscan. >>>> downgrade to 2.17, iirc. >>> >>> That correct, almost. The problem is in the epkowa backend and does >>> not >>> affect iscan. Other SANE frontends may be affected, scanimage is known >>> to be affected. >>> For the original post, see: >>> >>> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/2009-April/024488.html > > Hope this helps, Anyway iscan/epkowa in combination with the GT-2500 is a real useful thing. Thanks for it. Hope this helps (this should be followed by a grin smiley, but my browser doesn't produce it - it's an alpha-version - so another sorry). Wolfram Heider
