how would you characterize the support- minimal, basic, good, complete? and, just to be clear, it is the microtek2 backend which supports the machine? did you have to make any configuration file changes?
allan On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 11:08 AM, <ono at safe-mail.net> wrote: > In 2008 I unsuccessfully tried using xsane under Ubuntu (live CD) with my > Microtek ScanMaker 6400XL scanner. > https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=310753&group_id=30186&atid=410366 > On March 21, 2009, I downloaded the 'live' CD of the 20090320 build of Ubuntu > 9.04 alpha which has xsane 0.996 as part of the distribution. > My Microtek ScanMaker 6400XL scanner now works using xsane 0.996. > Thanks for fixing the microtek2 backend in sane-backends 1.0.19. > > The Microtek ScanMaker 6400XL scanner is not listed at > http://www.sane-project.org/sane-mfgs.html, either as supported or > unsupported. > I was going to add an entry for the Microtek ScanMaker 6400XL as supported on > the list at http://www.sane-project.org/sane-mfgs.html. > I only saw a method for adding unsupported scanners at > http://www.meier-geinitz.de/tinc?key=rDoQ7lrj&formname=adddev. > Is there some method for adding supported scanners to the list? > > -- > sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel > Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password" > ? ? ? ? ? ? to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org > -- "The truth is an offense, but not a sin"
