[Please CC me in all replies] On Sun, 2008-12-28 at 10:23 +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote: > Paul Wise <pabs3 at bonedaddy.net> wrote: > > The way to do this would be to define some USB protocol and have it > > standardised by the USB Implementers Forum, then use that to influence > > the OEM scanner manufacturers to implement it on new scanners. > > There actually was a scanner/imaging device standard class defined for > USB, and it never went anywhere.
Bah. Any pointers on that? I haven't been able to find anything on the intartubes about such a class yet. > > I would propose that the SANE network protocol be ported to USB (so that > > You'd better start from scratch and design a real protocol that > doesn't have all the suckiness and limitations the current SANE > network protocol has. Fair enough. -- bye, pabs http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20081229/6ce1add4/attachment.pgp
