On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Chris Bagwell <chris at cnpbagwell.com> wrote: > stef wrote: >> Le mercredi 21 janvier 2009 06:42:17 stef, vous avez ?crit : >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I have tried 'make libcheck' now it handles dynamic libraries. I >>> notice it >>> fails at the first violation without testing following libraries. I'd >>> rather have it check all libraries then fail at the end so we get the full >>> list of violations. >>> >> ... >> While I am at it, here's a proposed patch to make libchek behave like >> that. >> >> Regards, >> Stef >> >> > Looks good to me... I'll commit it soon . But while its out for review, > could some more people look at this patch? Specifically, at the list > its checking for "non-standard sane_* symbols".
That list looks good to me. > Since we are building dynamic libraries by default and libcheck wasn't > working before in default case, I wasn't sure how outdated that list > was. I've not yet had time to compare the list to current API document > but looks pretty close. SANE API never changes :) allan -- "The truth is an offense, but not a sin"
