Olaf Meeuwissen wrote: > Indeed, it is a bit difficult to split the work, but we could do it a > directory at a time. Start with the top-level without descending the > source tree and then add in subdirectories as you go. That way, each > of us can do a different directory and not step on the other's toes, > so to speak. What you posted to the list seems like a reasonable > starting point for the top-level directory (after you add a license > blurb). We should probably focus on getting the regular build for the > binary parts to work ASAP, then deal with the "support" targets for > documentation and website info and leave the "niceties" like > build-time options to select specific backends and such for later. > > Of course, we should also switch sane-frontends over. > > More detailed discussion we should probably take off-list. What do > you think? > Sounds good... I've got the top level changes done and will try to forward a patch tomorrow for people to comment on.
Chris
