On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 5:07 AM, Julien BLACHE <jb at jblache.org> wrote: > stef <stef.dev at free.fr> wrote: > >> unfortunately, we don't have the same idea of what SANE 1.1 goals >> should be. It has only been stated that SANE 1.1 will have to be compatible >> for backends not frontends. This is because we don't have the ability to test >> all the scanners that would have been impacted by bigger changes than those >> that went into SANE 1.1. > > In that case, you have to increment libsane's soversion. > > As far as I remember, we did not want to do that. > > So please increment V_MAJOR in configure.in to 2. You're breaking > everyone's system without that, and you're going to seriously piss off > distributors too (me first).
When i suggested this months ago, you swore that a soversion bump was out of the question. We've not changed our target since that time, why the change of heart on your end? allan -- "The truth is an offense, but not a sin"
