On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Louis Lagendijk <louis at lagendijk.xs4all.nl> wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 16:07 -0400, m. allan noah wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Louis Lagendijk >> <louis at lagendijk.xs4all.nl> wrote: >> > On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 15:42 -0400, m. allan noah wrote: >> >> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Louis Lagendijk >> >> <louis at lagendijk.xs4all.nl> wrote: >> >> > On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 15:20 -0400, m. allan noah wrote: >> >> >> is the existing sanei_udp code of any use to your driver? >> >> >> >> >> > I started off re-using the code I wrote for the CUPS bjnp backend. I am >> >> > considering re-writing the code to re-use sanei_udp and sanei_tcp code, >> >> > but a lot of the code is about message formatting and parsing. Re-use >> >> > will help in porting to other platforms (I am on x86_64 Linux). >> >> > >> >> >> >> It remains to be seen that any other backends will ever use it, so i >> >> would be inclined to keep as much of it with the backend as possible. >> >> using the existing sanei_usb and sanei_tcp would be good if you can, >> >> but not a requirement. >> >> >> >> N. Martin should weigh in at this point. >> > It was Nicolas that recommended I ask the question on the list as he was >> > not sure what the preferred route would be. It was actually him that >> > brought up the argument of the IANA allocation :-). I would tend to >> > agree with your argument that it is not very likely that any other >> > backend will ever use the protocol implementation. >> >> IIRC, some backends have sanei_* portions inside of them, making it >> easy to move later if required. how about that? >> > This is exactly what I did. I have a single c source file (pixma_bjnp.c) > that uses sanei_bjnp_xxx names for the non-private functions, where > pixma_bjnp.h defines the interface. > >> i just added to you the accept filter, but i dont know if that was >> what was blocking you. try again and we'll see. > > Ok, here we go..... >
looks good on both counts :) allan -- "The truth is an offense, but not a sin"
