Yes, you are correct that it is a permissions problem, I finally got the camera working properly by editing /etc/udev/rules.d/40-permissions.rules as per this thread:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=784864 I can now run xsane as root but not as user. I have looked through Groups settings several times and everything looks OK so I'm guessing I'll need to do more hand-editing. I'm too tired to do any more with this tonight but tomorrow I will revisit your comments and see where I can go with them. Thanks so much for your thoughts on this. Quoting kilgota at banach.math.auburn.edu: > Hi, > > Don't know about the scanner, but I do know a bit about the internals > of libgphoto2. The problem with the scanner is most probably similar to > what appears to happen with the camera: > > With approximately 99% probability, I would say that your problem with > the camera is a permissions problem. Quite likely, what has happened is > that the camera and perhaps the scanner also, is not listed in any of > the appropriate files in /etc/udev/rules.d in spite of the fact that > you have upgraded udev. Either that, or along with the upgraded udev > the rules are not what you expect. For example, the libgphoto2.rules > might expect you, as a user, to belong to a group called "camera" or > some variation on the same theme. One of the things that you might do > to try to localize the problem is to try running these devices as root. > If that works, then definitely it is a permissions problem and you need > to create the right entries in the libgphoto2.rules file and the > libsane.rules files, which are suitable for yourself, or if you do find > entries in those files for these devices (look for the USB > Vendor:Product number combination) and it wants your userid to belong > to some group and it does not, then either add yourself to the group or > change the rules file to let you do what you want. By all means, too, > you can contact Ubuntu and ask them just exactly what they have in mind > about how they intend for things like this to be done in Hardy Heron. I > do not know how they are handling such things as upgrades because I am > not using Ubuntu and instead I usually deal with things like this by > hand-editing the affected files. > > Sorry that there are these problems with permissions, but the > alternative is that these problems are not under control and then we > would have a Linux with all the lack of security that is found in > Windows. Clearly, none of us want that. But in return for the care > about security comes some occasional inconvenience, in the form of > problems like this. > > I hope this helps. > > Theodore Kilgore > > > On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, earther at eartherdesigns.com wrote: > >> Good news. I have made some progress after upgrading the Hardy udev >> package but still not out of the woods. >> >> lsusb now prints out correctly: >> >> ~$ lsusb >> Bus 008 Device 001: ID 0000:0000 >> Bus 007 Device 001: ID 0000:0000 >> Bus 006 Device 002: ID 03f0:0205 Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 3300c >> Bus 006 Device 001: ID 0000:0000 >> Bus 005 Device 001: ID 0000:0000 >> Bus 004 Device 001: ID 0000:0000 >> Bus 003 Device 001: ID 0000:0000 >> Bus 002 Device 006: ID 04a9:30fd Canon, Inc. PowerShot A610 (normal >> mode)/PowerShot A610 (PTP mode) >> Bus 002 Device 001: ID 0000:0000 >> Bus 001 Device 001: ID 0000:0000 >> >> And Sane now finds the scanner: >> >> ~# SANE_DEBUG_NIASH=255 scanimage -L >> [sanei_debug] Setting debug level of niash to 255. >> [niash] sane_init >> [niash] Looking for ScanJet 3300C... >> [niash] _AttachUsb: found libusb:006:003 >> [niash] niash: _ReportDevice 'libusb:006:003' >> [niash] Looking for ScanJet 3400C... >> [niash] Looking for ScanJet 4300C... >> [niash] Looking for HP ScanJet 4300c... >> [niash] Looking for Snapscan Touch... >> [niash] Looking for Office Scanner USB 19200... >> [niash] sane_get_devices >> device `niash:libusb:006:003' is a Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 3300C >> flatbed scanner >> [niash] sane_exit >> >> However, when launched, Sane spits out this error: >> >> Failed to open device 'niash:libusb:006:002': Device busy. >> >> Any ideas? >> >> FWIW, the camera is having problems too. Just in case it might be >> helpful, here's the error: >> >> "An error occurred in the io-library ('Could not claim the USB >> device'): Could not claim interface 0 (Operation not permitted). Make >> sure no other program or kernel module (such as sdc2xx, stv680, >> spca50x) is using the device and you have read/write access to the >> device." >> >> Thanks again for your expertise and patience. >> >> >> Quoting "m. allan noah" <kitno455 at gmail.com>: >>> >>> xsane is not the problem, but sane probably is. run this at the >>> command line as root: >>> >>> SANE_DEBUG_NIASH=255 scanimage -L >>> >>> and post the output to this list. >>> >>> allan >>> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org >> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel >> Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password" >> to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org >>