On Thursday 28 February 2008 23:55:27 Alessandro Zummo wrote: > On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:49:34 -0500 > "m. allan noah" <kitno455 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > yes- i am now inclined to agree with you, oliver. > > > > > Don`t you think you already lost control about what you started? > > > Please take a step back and take a look at what you are doing. > > well, maybe I should declare my intentions in a cleaner way. > > I would like to evolve sane by little steps, one after another, > while keeping compatibility. > > I want to do that by adding new frame types and new actions. > > Now if the other developers here can declare their intentions > and the way they want to implement them, we can have a better > picture of the thing that's going on and we can see if and > how we can work together toward the same target.
He - nice try! I think we agreed in adding some stuff, namely new FRAME_TYPES in the short term - others are for 2.x. We now have new frame-types - that's okay - BUT all other drawbacks we currently have in 1.x should and must be addressed by sane 2.x No more tweaks - compatible or not! - Gerhard
