Note also one thing about the SANE2 discussion: Currently I am working
on getting SANE1 into the LSB (I posted already about this some months
ago and no one answered). This will help us that it is much easier for
scanner manufacturers to ship drivers with their scanners. They can
simply build them with the LSB DDK and then they will work on all
(LSB-compliant) distros.
Till
stef wrote:
> Le Friday 28 March 2008 22:05:24 Julien BLACHE, vous avez ?crit :
>> stef <stef.dev at free.fr> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> I'm rather inclined to the "3" goal, since I feel there are
>>> quite a few things to do to improve SANE. Having a new standard
>>> doesn't mean SANE 1 stops to exist. Both can coexist.
>> Do you really think there is the needed manpower to co-maintain 2
>> versions of SANE?
>>
>> JB.
>>
>> --
>> Julien BLACHE <http://www.jblache.org>
>> <jb at jblache.org> GPG KeyID 0xF5D65169
>>
>
> Hello,
>
> indeed we are only a few people. But things can be done so that it
> isn't hard to achieve.
> However, does it mean you are akin to keep things as they are ? which is -of
> course- perfectly fine.
>
> Regards,
> Stef
>
