On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Julien BLACHE <jb at jblache.org> wrote: > ?tienne Bersac <bersace03 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > SANE or HAL. All the udi-sane name code must be in SANE and the addon > > must be in HAL. > > How does this new piece of SANE code integrate into the SANE > architecture? > > I'm sorry, I don't see where this code lies. > > I hope you do know that every SANE backend is 100% interchangeable > with every other SANE backend, and that what is called "libsane.so" is > nothing else than the DLL backend. > > As such, there's no central SANE library where to put this code. It > means it has to be duplicated into each backend, which sucks about as > much it can. > > I'd like more details on what you're trying to do, how you plan to do > it, etc. Your mails look like they've been written in a hurry, and > quality suffers accordingly. I also have the feeling that you're > trying to force that down our throats, which is a little bit > unpleasant. >
oh- i dont think he is trying to force anything, but this much like the LSB people. they are so used to thinking about their application, that they forget to do a sales pitch with people outside their group. i think we SANE devels suffer from the same problem. sell us on the IDEA first, then lets look at the implementation. allan -- "The truth is an offense, but not a sin"
