Hi Allan, Thanks for your message. I did what you suggested and got quite a lot of messages in the log filw (attached) but the result is still the same... No scanner found!
Any idea at that point? Marc On 23/06/06, m. allan noah <an...@pfeiffer.edu> wrote: > not that going back to linux would be all that bad :), but how about > getting a debug log for the plustek backend: > > SANE_DEBUG_PLUSTEK=255 scanimage -L 2>plustek-osx.log > > that log should give some clue. if the log is empty, the plustek backend > is not getting loaded... > > allan > > On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Marc Freitag wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have a Canoscan Lide 30 which used to work just fine with SANE under > > Linux. But I had to change my GNU/Linux laptop for a PowerBook and now > > things are getting more complex... First, the Canon doesn't provide a > > Twain driver but only some kind of photoshop plug--in. Of course, I > > don't have photoshop and the application given by Canon to use their > > plug-in in a "stand alone" way (Canoscan Toolbox) is of very, very > > poor quality. Anyway, I'd like to use the scanner with all the fine > > opensource software, in particular the Gimp. > > > > Here is what I get, when I run "sane-find-scanner": > > > > found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x220e [CanoScan], > > chip=LM983x?) at libusb:003:002-04a9-220e-ff-00 > > > > Notice the (I think) tell-tale "?" > > > > But then, "scanimage -L" doesn't find a thing. > > > > The backend for this scanner appears to be the plustek one. I have the > > plustek.conf file (in /sw/etc/sane.d as SANE was installed with fink). > > I have tried different things in this file, including putting > > > > [usb] 0x04a9 0x220e > > device auto > > > > or > > > > device libusb:003:002-04a9-220e-ff-00 > > > > or > > > > device libusb:003:002 > > > > But in no case is the scanner seen by scanimage... > > > > Is there a solution other than buy another scanner (or go back to Linux)?? > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > "so don't tell us it can't be done, putting down what you don't know. > money isn't our god, integrity will free our souls" - Max Cavalera > -- | Marc Freitag (freitag[at]ast!cam!ac!uk) | Institute of Astronomy | Madingley Road, CB3 0HA Cambridge, UK | Phone: +44 (0)1223 766 098 Fax: +44 (0)1223 337 523 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: plustek-osx.log Type: application/octet-stream Size: 10726 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20060624/92f636a1/plustek-osx-0001.obj From an...@pfeiffer.edu Sat Jun 24 12:53:49 2006 From: an...@pfeiffer.edu (m. allan noah) Date: Sat Jun 24 12:54:20 2006 Subject: [sane-devel] using SANE with a Canoscan LIDE 30 under mac osx In-Reply-To: <5b2675b20606240413m623ef0c0g8295424e3d187...@mail.gmail.com> References: <5b2675b20606221349h6de18515l9f428fd5fbfd0...@mail.gmail.com> <pine.lnx.4.61.0606221857240.5...@limos.pfeiffer.edu> <5b2675b20606240413m623ef0c0g8295424e3d187...@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <pine.lnx.4.61.0606240851110.28...@limos.pfeiffer.edu> On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, Marc Freitag wrote: > Hi Allan, > > Thanks for your message. I did what you suggested and got quite a lot > of messages in the log filw (attached) but the result is still the > same... No scanner found! > > Any idea at that point? yes- read the log, find the error and google for it :) very near the end, there is 'sanei_access_lock failed:'. locking is a relatively new feature in sane, and not many backends use it. plustek is one (the only?). i do not know where the packagers of your sane install decided the lock directory should be, but you have to make sure your user account has perms to write to that dir, usually in /var somewhere. allan > > Marc > > On 23/06/06, m. allan noah <an...@pfeiffer.edu> wrote: >> not that going back to linux would be all that bad :), but how about >> getting a debug log for the plustek backend: >> >> SANE_DEBUG_PLUSTEK=255 scanimage -L 2>plustek-osx.log >> >> that log should give some clue. if the log is empty, the plustek backend >> is not getting loaded... >> >> allan >> >> On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Marc Freitag wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > I have a Canoscan Lide 30 which used to work just fine with SANE under >> > Linux. But I had to change my GNU/Linux laptop for a PowerBook and now >> > things are getting more complex... First, the Canon doesn't provide a >> > Twain driver but only some kind of photoshop plug--in. Of course, I >> > don't have photoshop and the application given by Canon to use their >> > plug-in in a "stand alone" way (Canoscan Toolbox) is of very, very >> > poor quality. Anyway, I'd like to use the scanner with all the fine >> > opensource software, in particular the Gimp. >> > >> > Here is what I get, when I run "sane-find-scanner": >> > >> > found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x220e [CanoScan], >> > chip=LM983x?) at libusb:003:002-04a9-220e-ff-00 >> > >> > Notice the (I think) tell-tale "?" >> > >> > But then, "scanimage -L" doesn't find a thing. >> > >> > The backend for this scanner appears to be the plustek one. I have the >> > plustek.conf file (in /sw/etc/sane.d as SANE was installed with fink). >> > I have tried different things in this file, including putting >> > >> > [usb] 0x04a9 0x220e >> > device auto >> > >> > or >> > >> > device libusb:003:002-04a9-220e-ff-00 >> > >> > or >> > >> > device libusb:003:002 >> > >> > But in no case is the scanner seen by scanimage... >> > >> > Is there a solution other than buy another scanner (or go back to >> Linux)?? >> > >> > >> > Marc >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> -- >> "so don't tell us it can't be done, putting down what you don't know. >> money isn't our god, integrity will free our souls" - Max Cavalera >> > > > -- "so don't tell us it can't be done, putting down what you don't know. money isn't our god, integrity will free our souls" - Max Cavalera
