Hi, On Tuesday 09 May 2006 19:44, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: >[...] > Why not just kill the reader process in sane_cancel? Do you think the > way this is done in the existing backends (e.g. mustek) is wrong?
No, not at all. I was a little bit confused because I've designed my driver before I read the SANE standard and there is also a cancel() function in my driver but with different semantic. Now that you pointed me to an implementation of a reader process, everthing becomes clear. Thank you! :-) -- Wittawat Yamwong Hannover, Germany
