abel deuring <adeur...@gmx.net> wrote: > I don't want to open a discussion about licenses, but IMHO Sane's > exception to the GPL encourages cases like this one. I think it > would be more reasonable to put sane-backends under the LGPL, which
Good luck in getting every copyright holder (which includes every patch contributor) to agree to the relicensing :) > makes the rules for linking proprietary and free code very clear, Err, no, not really. It quickly becomes quite tricky to use LGPL code in an application in complete compliance with the license. > and especially enables end users to fiddle with the free code. JB. -- Julien BLACHE <http://www.jblache.org> <j...@jblache.org> GPG KeyID 0xF5D65169
