Hi,
On Friday 30 September 2005 08:26, Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thursday 29 September 2005 20:34, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 05:05:18PM +0200, Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
> > > please find attached a patch to make the OpticSlim M12 scanner
> > > work. Work here means, scan a sheet.
> >
> > I have included the patch into CVS with some modifications. Please
> > check if it still works. See below for details.
> >
> > > Calibration is not available,
> >
> > How does that work with sheet-fed scanners at all? Is there also some
> > kind of calibration area?
>
> as Gerard already stated. there's an extra calibration sheed, which
> needs to be scanned at the first time, then the settings are stored
> somewhere.
>
> >
> > > area selection is limited - positioning does currently not work.
> >
> > That means that length and width can be changed but not tl-x and tl-y?
>
> Yes and No. Need to do some more investigations on how to set tl-y, tl-x
> seems to be fine.
>
> > > The patch is meant as a starting point to make gt68xx based sheet-fed
> > > scanner
> > > work. It should apply to the current cvs.
> > >
> > > @Henning: It's up to you to include it. Maybe some changes are needed -
> > > I'll
> > > test them.
> > >
> > > Ciao,
> > > Gerhard
> >
> > > --- sane-backends/doc/descriptions/gt68xx.desc.orig 2005-09-27
> > > 11:19:02.000000000 +0200
> > > +++ sane-backends/doc/descriptions/gt68xx.desc 2005-09-29
> > > 16:57:39.000000000 +0200
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > + if (s->dev->model->flags & GT68XX_FLAG_SHEET_FED)
> > > + {
> > > + s->val[OPT_BACKTRACK_LINES].w = 0x3f;
> > > + DISABLE (OPT_BACKTRACK_LINES);
> > > + }
> > > +
> >
> > Is it really necessary to disable that option unconditionally?
> > Otherwise I would move the check for GT68XX_FLAG_SHEET_FED up to the
> > normal setting of that option (normally 0x3f is used for CCD).
>
> Hmmm, probably not.
Not tested, but go ahead - let's try your way.
>
> > > - RIE (gt68xx_scanner_calibrate (s, &scan_request));
> > > + if ( !(s->dev->model->flags & GT68XX_FLAG_SHEET_FED)) {
> > > + RIE (gt68xx_scanner_calibrate (s, &scan_request));
> > > + }
> >
> > I haven't changed that because coarse and fine calibration is turned
> > off anyway for that scanner.
>
> Okay!
>
> > > --- sane-backends/backend/gt68xx_devices.c.orig 2005-09-27
> > > 11:18:57.000000000 +0200
> > > +++ sane-backends/backend/gt68xx_devices.c 2005-09-29
> > > 11:29:05.000000000 +0200
> >
> > I used a new command_set for sheet-fed types. this way we have more
> > flexibility.
>
> Tried that in my first approach, but failed - anyway I'll test the changes.
>
> > Also there is one more level of indirection (always call
> > gt68xx_device_*, not gt68xx_generic_* or gt68xx_gt6816_* directly).
>
> Okay, I see.
>
> >
> > > --- sane-backends/backend/gt68xx_generic.c.orig 2005-09-27
> > > 11:18:57.000000000 +0200
> > > +++ sane-backends/backend/gt68xx_generic.c 2005-09-29
> > > 11:29:49.000000000 +0200
> > > @@ -96,10 +96,17 @@ gt68xx_generic_read_scanned_data (GT68xx
> > >
> > > RIE (gt68xx_device_req (dev, req, req));
> > >
> > > - if (req[0] == 0)
> > > - *ready = SANE_TRUE;
> > > + *ready = SANE_FALSE;
> > > + if (dev->model->flags & GT68XX_FLAG_SHEET_FED)
> > > + {
> > > + if (req[0] == 0 && req[1] == 0x35 )
> > > + *ready = SANE_TRUE;
> > > + }
> >
> > Is this really necessary? I know that 95% of the gt68xx scanners
> > return 00 35 but I only test for 00 beacuse of the 5% which don't
> > return the 35. If it also works with the test only for the 00, I would
> > prefer to keep the old version. At the moment, i have apllied your
> > patch, however.
>
> Maybe it is not necessary - I'll test that too.
Okay, works both ways - you can remove that and go back to the old behaviour.
>
> >
> > in gt68xx_geneirc_set_exposure-time:
> >
> > > + if (dev->model->flags & GT68XX_FLAG_SHEET_FED)
> > > + return SANE_STATUS_GOOD;
> > > +
> >
> > Not applied. Added a check in gt68xx_high.c instead.
>
> Okay.
Seems to work w/o modifications. I think setting the correct exposure times
needs to be done anyway.
>
> > > --- sane-backends/backend/gt68xx_gt6816.c.orig 2005-06-01
> > > 13:28:18.000000000 +0200
> > > +++ sane-backends/backend/gt68xx_gt6816.c 2005-09-29 11:23:28.000000000
> > > +0200
> > > @@ -217,6 +217,9 @@ gt6816_carriage_home (GT68xx_Device * de
> > > {
> > > GT68xx_Packet req;
> > >
> > > + if (dev->model->flags & GT68XX_FLAG_SHEET_FED)
> > > + return SANE_STATUS_GOOD;
> > > +
> >
> > Not applied. Added checks in gt68xx.c instead.
>
> Okay.
>
> >
> >
> > In stop scan:
> > > {
> > > GT68xx_Packet req;
> > >
> > > + if (dev->model->flags & GT68XX_FLAG_SHEET_FED)
> > > + {
> > > + memset (req, 0, sizeof (req));
> > > + req[0] = 0x42;
> > > + req[1] = 0x01;
> >
> > Not applied. Used gt6801_stop_scan instead in the new command_set.
>
> Okay - Thanks for the new version, I'll test that the next days.
Well, I've checked the CVS version and it works "out of the box" with
the previous mentioned restrictions. I think this is now a good base
for further work...
Ciao,
Gerhard
