On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 22:06:07 +0200, Henning Meier-Geinitz <henn...@meier-geinitz.de> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 09:01:26PM +0200, Florian Reichert wrote: >> >I'm cc'ing sane-devel because I'm not an expert for that scanner. > > Again. Please do not send mails to me personally, please send the to > the sane-devel mailing list. Sorry ... But Opera Mail does not recognice broken ReplyTos ... >> >On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 01:04:59PM +0200, Wolfram Heider wrote: >> >>On 14.10.03 12:10:02 you wrote in reply to Florian Reichert: >> >>That scanner (i.e. Epson Perfection 1670) is not supported yet but >> it's >> >>being worked on. >> >>[...] >> >> And what aout the epkowa backand? Is that working? Or work in progress? > > Olaf Meeuwissen <o...@zen.epkowa.co.jp> wrote about that topic > (quoting "Ed Hamrick" <use...@hamrick.com>): > > | > It turns out that the 1670 is actually made by Acer/BenQ, > | > just like the Perfection 660, and uses Acer commands. > | > | That is correct and also the main reason why this scanner will not be > | supported by "Image Scan! for Linux". But at least now I can forward > | people somewhere! > >> Seems to be difficult to get a supported scanner for less than 150 (or >> max. 200) Euro. > > I can't comment on speed or quality, but it's possible to buy scanners > cheaper than 150 Euros that are supported by SANE. Just a quick check > at www.alternate.de: > > Canon Lide 20 59,00 > Canon Lide 30 77,00 > Epson Perfection 1260 Photo 94.00 > Mustek Be@rPaw 1200CS 66.00 > Mustek Be@rPaw 1200CU+ 64.00 Yes I know that scanners but they seem to be verry slow ones. So it seems I have to have a look for the epson Perfection 2400 Photo. This seems to be the only fast scanner for less than 200 Euro. But any further sugestions will be welcome. Regards Florian -- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
